有名人の統計
0 人の有名人のタイプ、プロフィール、権威の分布分析
We analyzed 13,691 real charts (11,195 celebrities + 2,496 users) — the only Human Design study that measures the frequency of each channel separately. Here's what we found.
TV runs on Charisma
Channel 20-34 (Charisma) appears in 18.6% of TV personalities vs 12.0% baseline — the strongest signal of the whole study. TV's second channel is 29-46 Discovery (14.3% vs 9.0%).
Athletes carry Power
34-57 (Power) among athletes: 15.7% vs 12.0%. Alongside: sacral motors 2-14 The Beat, 1-8 Inspiration and 19-49 Synthesis.
Business picks Struggle
Channel 28-38 (Struggle — stubborn fight for meaning) among business figures: 17.9% vs 12.4%. Second signal: 6-59 Intimacy (16.1% vs 11.7%).
Military: Wavelength + Emoting
16-48 (The Wavelength — mastery through repetition) among military leaders: 13.0% vs 8.6%. Plus 39-55 Emoting (12.8% vs 9.0%).
Scientists & writers mature
42-53 (Maturation — finishing cycles) is over-represented in both science (12.1%) and literature (12.6%) vs 8.2% baseline. Scientists also carry 7-31 The Alpha (13.1% vs 9.3%).
Spiritual leaders are Manifestors
Among spiritual figures, Manifestors are 14.4% — 1.4× the 10.2% baseline. Mirror fact: among influencers Manifestors are just 5.9% — modern influence runs on response, not initiation.
Ra's canon holds across 13,691 charts
Type distribution across the corpus: Generators 35.3% + MG 32.1% (67.4% combined), Projectors 21.3%, Manifestors 10.2%, Reflectors 1.0% — almost exactly the canonical 70/20/9/1. Emotional authority: 51.2%.
The rarest channel is Awakening
10-20 (Awakening — being yourself here and now) appears in just 3.0% of charts — humanity's rarest channel. The most common: 20-34 Charisma (14.6%). Average channels per chart: 3.4; corpus record — 9.
Methodology: frequencies compared against the corpus-wide baseline; reported signals are significant at z ≥ 3 (most at z ≥ 4, surviving Bonferroni correction across ~540 comparisons). Most celebrity birth times are unknown (noon default) — this adds noise to profiles/lines but barely affects channels and type. Correlation ≠ causation.